|
Blatant Attack on Our Local NHS - "Cuts from Whitehall"
Questioning by local Lib Dem
MP, Edward Davey, has brought confirmation that Kingston’s health
budget crisis has been created by Labour Ministers and London health
bureaucrats.
In an astonishing reply to Edward Davey’s letter
questioning the validity of top-slicing[1][1] Kingston’s budget to help
out elsewhere in London and a £2 million interest rate payment
being demanded from Kingston’s PCT, Labour Health Minister, Andy
Burnham confirmed that PCTs like Kingston would be hit with a penalty
10% charge and with a clawback now estimated at £7 million.
Edward Davey said:
“While Kingston’s NHS has reduced spending by £8 million this
year – partly through cuts affecting local patient care - Labour in
Whitehall is taking £9 million from local health budgets.
“Labour Ministers have created huge uncertainty with its management of
health budgets, and have made a difficult situation in Kingston almost
impossible. This is a blatant attack on our local NHS.
“When a Minister describes a 10% penalty charge as a “Secretary of
State allocation adjustment”, it’s clear we’ve entered a 1984 Big
Brother world of “Newspeak”. Labour are simply desperate to avoid the
word “cuts”, in case it seems as if we are going back to the bad old
Tory days.“The truth is, these are damaging cuts to Kingston’s NHS, and
they come from Whitehall. I hope local people will back my campaign to
stop the NHS cuts.”
“We had the good news recently of funding to revitalise
the Broadway, and our campaign to oppose Tesco’s plans that will
throttle Tolworth has been receiving national coverage. So just as we
are beginning to make progress, the last thing we need is to lose the
Broadway’s post office permanently. I will be working with local
councillors to ensure this does not happen.”
Ends
Notes to Editors
[1] Top Slicing is a financial tool to allow a fee to be
paid by a PCT (in this case) to the Strategic Health Authority for
London. This year Kingston PCT has to pay £7 million. Ruth
Carnell, Chief Executive of London NHS, stated in her letter of 4
December 2006 “This reserve will be used to support those organisations
in deficit” yet in the letter to Edward Davey from Andy Burnham such
justification was lacking and the government minister advocated that
such a fund was merely an accountancy tool stating, “SHA’s will not
redistribute the resources to overspending organisations, but the
system will allow them to record balance across the patch.”
|